A comparison of two common bile duct ligation methods to establish hepatopulmonary syndrome animal models

40Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The major drawback of the current common bile duct ligation (CBDL)-induced hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) animal model is the extremely high mortality rate that hinders experimental studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate an improved method of CBDL with the goal of developing a simple and reproducible rat HPS model after a single CBDL treatment. Two groups of male Sprague–Dawley rats underwent separate methods of CBDL: (1) the upper common bile duct ligation (UCBDL) group (n¼40), in which the first ligature was made near the junction of the hepatic ducts, and the second ligature was made above the entrance of the pancreatic duct; (2) the middle of the common bile duct ligation (MCBDL) group (n¼40), in which the first ligature was made in the middle of the common bile duct, and the second ligature was made above the entrance of the pancreatic duct. The CBDL-induced HPS rats were evaluated by pulse oximeter, arterial blood analysis, histopathology, and cerebral uptake of intravenous technetium-99m-labeled albumin macroaggregates (which reflects intrapulmonary vascular dilation). The mortality rates of the UCBDL group and the MCBDL group were 42.5% and 77.5%, respectively (P<0.05). These results suggest that the UCBDL, a single improved procedure, provides a better method compared to the established HPS model, because of the relatively high success rate and the decreased risk of complications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Y., Chen, B., Chen, Y., Zu, B., Yi, B., & Lu, K. (2015). A comparison of two common bile duct ligation methods to establish hepatopulmonary syndrome animal models. Laboratory Animals, 49(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677214558701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free