Reflections around artefacts: Using a deliberative approach to teaching reflective practices in fashion studies

  • Ryan M
  • Brough D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While requiring students to think reflectively is a desirable teaching goal, it is often fraught with complexity and is sometimes poorly implemented in higher education. In this paper, we describe an approach to academic reflective practices that fitted a design subject in fashion education and was perceived as effective in enhancing student learning outcomes. In many design-based disciplines, it is essential to evaluate, through a reflective lens, the quality of tangible design outcomes -referred to here as artefacts. Fashion studio based practice (unlike many other theory based disciplines) requires an artefact to be viewed in order to initiate the reflective process. This reflection is not solely limited to reflective writing; the reflection happens through sight, touch and other non-traditional approaches. Fashion students were asked to reflect before, during and after the development of an artefact. Through a variety of media, a review of the first garment prototype -called a Sample Review -occurred. The reflective practices of students during the Sample Review provided a valuable insight into their own learning, as well as a valid assessment indicator for the lecturer. It also mirrored industry practices for design evaluation. We believe that this deliberative approach, characterised by artefact-prompted reflection, has wide applicability across undergraduate courses in a variety of discipline areas.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryan, M., & Brough, D. (2012). Reflections around artefacts: Using a deliberative approach to teaching reflective practices in fashion studies. Journal of Learning Design, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v5i1.90

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

65%

Design 3

18%

Psychology 2

12%

Philosophy 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0