Automated discrimination of pathological regions in tissue images: Unsupervised clustering vs. supervised SVM classification

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recognizing and isolating cancerous cells from non pathological tissue areas (e.g. connective stroma) is crucial for fast and objective immunohistochemical analysis of tissue images. This operation allows the further application of fully-automated techniques for quantitative evaluation of protein activity, since it avoids the necessity of a preventive manual selection of the representative pathological areas in the image, as well as of taking pictures only in the pure-cancerous portions of the tissue. In this paper we present a fully-automated method based on unsupervised clustering that performs tissue segmentations highly comparable with those provided by a skilled operator, achieving on average an accuracy of 90%. Experimental results on a heterogeneous dataset of immunohistochemical lung cancer tissue images demonstrate that our proposed unsupervised approach overcomes the accuracy of a theoretically superior supervised method such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) by 8%. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Cataldo, S., Ficarra, E., & Macii, E. (2008). Automated discrimination of pathological regions in tissue images: Unsupervised clustering vs. supervised SVM classification. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 25 CCIS, pp. 344–356). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92219-3_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free