Declining trends in the provision of pre natal Care visits by family physicians

55Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE We wanted to measure trends in the proportion of prenatal visits pro- vided by family physicians nationally for a 10-year period and determine charac- teristics of prenatal visits made to family physicians compared with visits made to obstetricians. METHODS We analyzed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to identify prenatal visits made to family physicians and obstetricians between 1995 and 2004. The primary outcome measure was the trend in proportion of prenatal visits seen by family physicians. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined char- acteristics of a prenatal visit occurring with a family physician vs an obstetrician. RESULTS A total of 6,203 records were included in the study, representing 244 million prenatal visits. The percentage of prenatal visits provided by family physi- cians decreased from 11.6% in 1995-1996 to 6.1% in 2003-2004 (P =.02 for trend). In non-metropolitan statistical areas, family physicians decreased their pro- vision of prenatal visits from 38.6% in 1995-1996 to 12.9% in 2003-2004 (P =.03 for trend). Prenatal visits made to family physicians were associated with location in a non-metropolitan statistical area (OR = 5.56; 95% CI, 3.23-9.62), Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10-2.82), and younger maternal age (aged 30 years and older vs aged less than 24 years: OR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95). CONCLUSIONS Family physicians reduced their provision of prenatal visits by nearly 50% during a 10-year period and at an even greater rate in rural, non-metropolitan statistical areas. These f ndings should be considered as family medicine considers the role of maternity care and strives to provide accessible prenatal services for all.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, D., & Coco, A. (2009). Declining trends in the provision of pre natal Care visits by family physicians. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(2), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.916

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free