A model of local coherence effects in human sentence processing as consequences of updates from bottom-up prior to posterior beliefs

9Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Human sentence processing involves integrating probabilistic knowledge from a variety of sources in order to incrementally determine the hierarchical structure for the serial input stream. While a large number of sentence processing effects have been explained in terms of comprehenders' rational use of probabilistic information, effects of local coherences have not. We present here a new model of local coherences, viewing them as resulting from a belief-update process, and show that the relevant probabilities in our model are calculable from a probabilistic Earley parser. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that an implemented version of the model makes the correct predictions for the materials from the original experiment demonstrating local coherence effects. © 2009 Association for Computational Linguistics.

References Powered by Scopus

Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension

1954Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Expectation-based syntactic comprehension

1369Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference

1175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Memory and surprisal in human sentence comprehension

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Entropy and graph based modelling of document coherence using discourse entities: An application to IR

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bicknell, K., & Levy, R. (2009). A model of local coherence effects in human sentence processing as consequences of updates from bottom-up prior to posterior beliefs. In NAACL HLT 2009 - Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 665–673). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1620754.1620851

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

57%

Researcher 14

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 36

55%

Linguistics 16

25%

Psychology 10

15%

Neuroscience 3

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free