Acromegaly complicated with fulminant pituitary apoplexy: clinical characteristic analysis and review of literature

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively summarize the clinical features of acromegaly complicated with fulminant pituitary apoplexy and analyze the prognostic factors to guide early identification and timely treatment of such patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out to summarize the clinical manifestations, hormone changes, imaging, treatment and follow-up of ten patients with acromegaly complicated with fulminant pituitary apoplexy admitted to our hospital from February 2013 to September 2021. Results: The mean age of the ten patients (five males and five females) at the time of pituitary apoplexy was 37.1 ± 13.4 years old. There were nine cases with sudden severe headaches and five cases with visual impairment. All patients had pituitary macroadenomas, of which six cases with Knosp grade ≥3. The level of GH/IGF-1 hormone after pituitary apoplexy was lower compared with pre-apoplexy, and 1 patient reached biochemical remission spontaneously. Seven patients underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery after apoplexy and one patient was treated with long-acting somatostatin analog. The biochemical remission rate was 37.5% in eight patients immediately after treatment and 50% at the last follow-up. Patients with Knosp grade ≥3 were less likely to achieve biochemical remission than those with Knosp grade <3 (16.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.048), and patients who achieved biochemical remission had a smaller maximum tumor diameter [20.1 (20.1,28.0) mm vs. 44.0 (44.0,60) mm, p = 0.016]. Conclusion: Acromegaly complicated with fulminant pituitary apoplexy remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, X. Q., Zhou, X., Yao, Y., Deng, K., You, H., Duan, L., & Zhu, H. J. (2023). Acromegaly complicated with fulminant pituitary apoplexy: clinical characteristic analysis and review of literature. Endocrine, 81(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03379-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free