Adhesion molecule polymorphisms in chronic renal allograft failure

94Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Chronic allograft failure (CAF) is a major cause of late graft loss in renal transplantation. Up-regulation of adhesion molecules has been demonstrated in renal allograft biopsies during both acute and chronic rejection, and these molecules are known to regulate leukocyte migration into the graft. Methods. A single-center retrospective study was performed between 1985 and 1996 on renal transplant recipients who developed CAF. Genotyping was performed for five polymorphisms in intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and L-selectin. Frequency data for the polymorphisms in the CAF group (N = 62) and their matched donors, where available (N = 33), were compared with a group of recipients with graft survival of more than 10 years (N = 110) and a group of United Kingdom (UK) controls (N = 101). Results. A variant allele in exon 4 of ICAM-1 (R241) was more common in the CAF recipients compared with both long-term survivors and UK controls (19.4 vs. 10.0 and 9.4%, P = 0.015 and 0.025). In addition, stratification by time to graft failure caused by CAF revealed more rapid failure in the presence of another ICAM-1 variant in the recipient (E469) in exon 6 (P = 0.033). Conclusions. ICAM-1 polymorphisms may represent a predetermined genetic risk factor for CAF. The polymorphism in exon 4 is in the Mac-1 binding site, and that in exon 6 is in the fifth immunoglobulin-like domain. Potential mechanisms of action of ICAM-1 variants in CAF include an alteration of activity as an adhesion molecule, altered costimulation, or a minor histocompatibility antigen.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McLaren, A. J., Marshall, S. E., Haldar, N. A., Mullighan, C. G., Fuggle, S. V., Morris, P. J., & Welsh, K. I. (1999). Adhesion molecule polymorphisms in chronic renal allograft failure. Kidney International, 55(5), 1977–1982. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00427.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free