Using discrete-return airborne laser scanning to quantify number of canopy strata across diverse forest types

34Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The vertical arrangement of forest canopies is a key descriptor of canopy structure, a driver of ecosystem function and indicative of forest successional stage. Yet techniques to attribute for canopy vertical structure across large and potentially heterogeneously forested areas remain elusive. This study introduces a new technique to estimate the Number of Strata (NoS) that comprise a canopy profile, using discrete-return Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data. Vertically resolved gap probability (Pgap) aggregated over a plot is generalized with a nonparametric cubic spline regression (Ps). Subsequently a count of the positive zero-crossings of second derivative of 1 − Ps is used to estimate NoS. Comparison with inventory derived estimates at 24 plots across three diverse study areas shows a good agreement between the two techniques (RMSE = 0·41 strata). Furthermore, this is achieved without altering model parameters, indicating the transferability of the technique across diverse forest types. NoS values ranged from 0 to 4 at a further 239 plots, emphasizing the need for a method to quantify canopy vertical structure across forested landscapes. Comparison of NoS with other commonly derived ALS descriptors of canopy structure (canopy height, canopy cover and return height coefficient of determination) returned only a moderate correlation (r2 < 0·4). It is proposed the presented method provides a primary descriptor of canopy structure to complement canopy height and cover, as well as a candidate Ecological Biodiversity Variable for characterizing habitat structure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilkes, P., Jones, S. D., Suarez, L., Haywood, A., Mellor, A., Woodgate, W., … Skidmore, A. K. (2016). Using discrete-return airborne laser scanning to quantify number of canopy strata across diverse forest types. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free