A population-based analysis of secondary malignancies in breast cancer patients receiving breast reconstruction

12Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is an ongoing debate about the relationship between breast implants and secondary malignancies. Methods: Breast cancer patients undergoing surgical reconstruction after mastectomy by either implants or autologous flap were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry between 1998 and 2002. The occurrence of secondary malignancies at least 1 year after diagnosis was compared between breast reconstruction with implants vs autologous flap. Results: Of 7955 women, 3727 underwent reconstruction using implants and 4228 using autologous flap. The incidence of secondary tumours was similar in both the groups (hazards ratio (HR)=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.26, P=0.880). For lung cancer, a significantly increased risk for implants (HR=2.51, 95% CI: 1.28-4.95, P=0.005) was observed. Conclusions: Except for lung cancer, no association between implants and secondary malignancies including lymphomas was observed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warschkow, R., Cerny, T., Schmied, B. M., Güller, U., Thuerlimann, B., & Joerger, M. (2016). A population-based analysis of secondary malignancies in breast cancer patients receiving breast reconstruction. British Journal of Cancer, 115(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free