Image quality and radiation dose in propagation based phase contrast mammography with a microfocus X-ray tube: A phantom study

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Digital mammography has limitations in sensitivity, in particular for patients with a dense breast. Phase contrast techniques (phase contrast mammography, PCM) might increase the tissue contrast for breast imaging. Propagation based PCM with a dedicated 0.1-mm-focal spot size mammography unit was investigated in past years, showing higher image quality in magnification PCM than in absorption based DM. In this work the authors investigated, using breast phantoms, the dependence of image quality on increasing mean glandular dose with a 0.007-mm-focal spot size W-anode microfocus X-ray tube. They compared PCM imaging (magnification M ≅ 2) to absorption based contact imaging (M ≅ 1) and then to phase retrieval for phase imaging, at low (40 kV) as well as high (80 kV) beam energy. Phase imaging shows higher image contrast for glandular masses and microcalcifications with MGD similar to one-view mammography. The phase contrast power spectrum assumes higher values than for absorption imaging. Possibility of dose reduction was suggested by the adoption of phase retrieval PCM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castriconi, R., Mettivier, G., & Russo, P. (2016). Image quality and radiation dose in propagation based phase contrast mammography with a microfocus X-ray tube: A phantom study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9699, pp. 618–624). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_77

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free