Comparison of Kangaroo Care and standard care: Behavioral organization, development, and temperament in healthy, low-birth-weight infants through 1 year

91Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Kangaroo Care (KC) for healthy, low-birth-weight (LBW) infants can promote better behavioral and developmental outcomes. Study Design: In this historical control study, 26 infants in the KC group (GA: 34.3 ± 2.5 weeks, BW: 1833.9 ± 167.6 g) and 27 infants in the comparison group who received the standard medical - nursing care (34.6 ± 2.3 weeks, 1850.9 ± 156.7 g) were analyzed by the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) at 40 weeks of postmenstrual age, the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Carey's Infant Temperament Questionnaire (ITQ) at 6 and 12 months corrected ages. Results: KC infants had significantly higher NBAS scores in Orientation, State Regulation, and Supplementary items; lower Intensity scores and higher Mood scores at 6 months on the ITQ; and higher Bayley Scales score at 12 months. Conclusion: KC effectively promoted neonatal behavioral organization and enhanced developmental outcome over the first year of life for LBW infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohgi, S., Fukuda, M., Moriuchi, H., Kusumoto, T., Akiyama, T., Nugent, J. K., … Saitoh, H. (2002). Comparison of Kangaroo Care and standard care: Behavioral organization, development, and temperament in healthy, low-birth-weight infants through 1 year. Journal of Perinatology, 22(5), 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210749

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free