The current study assessed sex differences in thermoregulatory and physiological adaptation to short-term (STHA) and long-term heat acclimation (LTHA). Sixteen (eight males; eight females) participants performed three running heat tolerance tests (RHTT), preceding HA (RHTT1), following 5 days HA (RHTT2) and 10 days HA (RHTT3). The RHTT involved 30-min running (9km/h, 2% gradient) in 40°C, 40% relative humidity. Following STHA, resting rectal temperature (Trrest) (males: -0.24±0.16°C, P≤0.001; females: -0.02±0.08°C, P=0.597), peak rectal temperature (Trpeak) (males: -0.39±0.36°C, P≤0.001; females -0.07±0.18°C, P=0.504), and peak heart rate (males: -14±12 beats/min, P≤0.001; females: -5±3 beats/min, P=0.164) reduced in males, but not females. Following STHA, sweat rate relative to body surface area (SRBSA) increased (428±269g/h/m2, P=0.029) in females, but not males (-11±286g/h/m2, P=0.029). Following LTHA, Trrest (males: -0.04±0.15°C, P=0.459; females: -0.22±0.12°C, P≤0.01) and Trpeak (males: -0.05±0.26°C, P=0.590; females: -0.41±0.24°C, P≤0.01) reduced in females, but not males. Following LTHA, SRBSA increased in males (308±346g/h/m2, P=0.029), but not females (44±373g/h/m2, P=0.733). Males and females responded to STHA; however, females required LTHA to establish thermoregulatory and cardiovascular stability. HA protocols should be designed to target sex differences in thermoregulation for optimal adaptation.
CITATION STYLE
Mee, J. A., Gibson, O. R., Doust, J., & Maxwell, N. S. (2015). A comparison of males and females’ temporal patterning to short- and long-term heat acclimation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 25(S1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12417
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.