Outcome measures in polymyalgia rheumatica. A systematic review

15Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To identify the instruments used to assess polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in published studies. Methods. A systematic literature review of clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies related to PMR, published from 1970 to 2014, was carried out. All outcome and assessment instruments were extracted and categorized according to core areas and domains, as defined by the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) Filter 2.0. Results. Thirty-five articles (3221 patients) were included: 12 randomized controlled trials (RCT); 3 nonrandomized trials; and 20 observational studies. More than 20 domains were identified, measured by 29 different instruments. The most frequently used measures were pain, morning stiffness, patient global assessment and physician global assessment, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. The definition of outcomes varied considerably between studies. Conclusion. The outcome measures and instruments used in PMR are numerous and diversely defined. The establishment of a core set of validated and standardized outcome measurements is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duarte, C., De Oliveira Ferreira, R. J., Mackie, S. L., Kirwan, J. R., & Da Silva, J. A. P. (2015). Outcome measures in polymyalgia rheumatica. A systematic review. Journal of Rheumatology, 42(12), 2503–2511. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150515

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free