Space matters when defining effective management for invasive plants

34Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Invasive alien species are a threat to biodiversity and can harm resident plants, animals, humans and infrastructure. To reduce deleterious effects, effective management planning for invasive plants is required. Currently, the effectiveness of management is primarily optimized locally through eradication of individual populations. By contrast, spatial prioritization of control activities at the landscape level has received less attention, despite its potential to improve management planning in complex landscapes, especially under budget constraints. Location: North-eastern Switzerland, Europe. Methods: We used a dynamic simulation model to evaluate the effectiveness of spatially designed management planning for controlling the expansion of three invasive alien plants (IAPs; Heracleum mantegazzianum, Impatiens glandulifera and Reynoutria japonica) across a heterogeneous landscape in North-eastern Switzerland. The model predicted the spread of IAPs from their current distribution under constraints of 361 control options differing in local intensity, frequency, duration, area and spatial prioritization of eradication measures. Results: Our results demonstrate that IAP-control actions under a restricted budget are more effective if control actions are spatially prioritized. Most effective spatial treatments generally prioritized small populations in the case of the annual species and large populations in the case of the perennial species. Further, applying intensive control at early stages generally increased effectiveness of control. Main conclusions: For IAP-management planning, our findings suggest that control should be applied early when IAPs start spreading, to maximize success or minimize costs. Further, spatial prioritization schemes are particularly useful under limited financial means for IAP-management. Finally, our modelling approach may serve as a proof of concept to evaluate the effectiveness of control actions of various IAPs in complex landscapes. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas

16737Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology

6001Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control

5003Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Using single- and multi-date UAV and satellite imagery to accurately monitor invasive knotweed species

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamics of invasive alien plant species in China under climate change scenarios

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic models in research and management of biological invasions

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meier, E. S., Dullinger, S., Zimmermann, N. E., Baumgartner, D., Gattringer, A., & Hülber, K. (2014). Space matters when defining effective management for invasive plants. Diversity and Distributions, 20(9), 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12201

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

49%

Researcher 29

39%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 40

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38

48%

Philosophy 1

1%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free