Thoracoscopy versus the open approach for resection of solitary pulmonary metastases

19Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The rebirth of thoracoscopy in the 1990s led to its utilization in nearly all areas of thoracic surgery, both diagnostic and therapeutic. Because of its minimally invasive nature, thoracoscopy has been accepted as the approach of choice for many thoracic surgical procedures such as pleural biopsy and sympathectomy. There are, however, areas of great controversy in which the utility of thoracoscopy continues to be highly debated and one such area is the therapeutic resection of pulmonary metastases. © 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naunheim, K. S. (2007). Thoracoscopy versus the open approach for resection of solitary pulmonary metastases. In Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach (pp. 151–157). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-474-8_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free