Wound duration and healing rates: cause or effect?

53Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Multiple factors affect the likelihood of a wound healing. One of these factors, wound duration, is well known to be related to healing rates, with numerous publications showing that older wounds are less likely to heal. However, disentangling the effect of this factor on wound healing rates is complex. Is this simply an observation of the obvious; wounds of longer duration will by definition be harder to heal? Or does time represent an independent factor, implying that should treatments be given earlier in the disease process, better outcomes may result? This review summarizes the available evidence of the effects of wound duration on healing rates and examines potential biological aberrations identified in chronic wounds, which may be significant in making chronic wounds difficult to heal. Wounds of longer duration are associated with excessive inflammation, fibroblast senescence, and alterations in wound bed flora, which appears to have a temporal relationship. Early and aggressive treatment of ulcers that fail to respond to standard care may well aid in reducing the burden of wounds that become chronic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosanquet, D. C., & Harding, K. G. (2014). Wound duration and healing rates: cause or effect? Wound Repair and Regeneration : Official Publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free