Towards user-oriented RBAC model

12Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Role mining recently has attracted much attention from the role-based access control (RBAC) research community as it provides a machine-operated means of discovering roles from existing permission assignments. While there is a rich body of literature on role mining, we find that user experience/perception - one ultimate goal for any information system - is surprisingly ignored by the existing works. This work is the first to study role mining from the end-user perspective. Specifically, based on the observation that end-users prefer simple role assignments, we propose to incorporate to the role mining process a user-role assignment sparseness constraint that mandates the maximum number of roles each user can have. Under this rationale, we formulate user-oriented role mining as two specific problems: one is user-oriented exact role mining problem (RMP), which is obliged to completely reconstruct the given permission assignments, and the other is user-oriented approximate RMP, which tolerates a certain amount of deviation from the complete reconstruction. The extra sparseness constraint poses a great challenge to role mining, which in general is already a hard problem. We examine some typical existing role mining methods to see their applicability to our problems. In light of their insufficiency, we present a new algorithm, which is based on a novel dynamic candidate role generation strategy, tailored to our problems. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm. © 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lu, H., Hong, Y., Yang, Y., Duan, L., & Badar, N. (2013). Towards user-oriented RBAC model. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7964 LNCS, pp. 81–96). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39256-6_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free