Agrarian structure and underdevelopment in Latin America: Bringing the latifundio “Back in”

6Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Latin American scholars in the twentieth century often pointed to the agrarian question and the dominance of the large latifundio estates as the key to explaining their countries’ underdevelopment. Yet, in more recent years, the emphasis on agrarian structures has declined and the latifundio is no longer seen as a relevant factor to economic development. In its place have emerged explanations that emphasize international trade relations, institutions, or the capacity of local states. This study makes a case for bringing the latifundio “back in” to explanations of underdevelopment in Latin America, and points to the persistence of particular property relations, low-intensity land use, and low-risk productive strategies throughout the region as barriers to development. Agricultural census data and various other sources on land use suggest that large latifundio estates are still a relevant factor throughout the region, and I argue that they continue to represent a significant barrier for the deepening of industrialization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carlson, C. (2019). Agrarian structure and underdevelopment in Latin America: Bringing the latifundio “Back in.” Latin American Research Review, 54(3), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.860

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free