Location of Emergency Treatment Sites after Earthquake using Hybrid Simulation

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A mass-casualty natural disaster such as an earthquake is a rare, surprising event that is usually characterized by chaos and a lack of information, resulting in an overload of casualties in hospitals. Thus, it is very important to refer minor and moderately-injured casualties, that are the majority of casualties and whose injuries are usually not life threatening, to ad hoc care facilities such as Emergency Treatment Sites (ETSs). These facilities support the efficient use of health resources and reduce the burden on permanent healthcare facilities. In our study, a hybrid simulation model, based on a combination of discrete events and an agent-based simulation, provides a solution to the uncertainty of positioning temporary treatment sites. The simulation methodology used compares between "rigid" and "flexible" operating concepts of ETSs (main vs. main+minor ETSs) and found the "flexible" concept to be more efficient in terms of the average walking distance and number of casualties treated in the disaster area.

References Powered by Scopus

A survey of healthcare facility location

392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review

297Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake

269Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Coordination mechanisms applied to logistical systems for local disaster preparedness: a Latin American case

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadosh, S. C., Sinuany-Stern, Z., & Bitan, Y. (2023). Location of Emergency Treatment Sites after Earthquake using Hybrid Simulation. Tehnicki Glasnik, 17(3), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20230511184836

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0