Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target

4Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

University students named a 72-ms masked target word that was preceded by two 120-ms consecutively presented words, a prime word followed by a distractor. In Experiment 1, all words were in lowercase letters, whereas in Experiment 2, the target word was changed to uppercase letters. In both experiments there was an accuracy and latency cost (repetition blindness: RB) when the prime was the same word as the target, with the cost much less severe in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. A low-frequency distractor impaired target identification compared with a high-frequency distractor. Distractor frequency interacted with target frequency such that high-frequency targets preceded by low-frequency distractors had the lowest accuracy. The results are consistent with a frequency-dependent competition for access to working memory among briefly displayed words. However, there was no clear evidence that effects of target repetition on interword competition play a role in RB. The effects of a letter case change for the target are consistent with a contribution of token distinctiveness to word-order recovery in the intervening-word priming task.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burt, J. S., & Jolley, J. (2017). Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target. Memory and Cognition, 45(7), 1171–1181. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0726-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free