The Commentarial Tradition

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the Confucian tradition, few students of the classics read canonical writings without the aid of some form of gloss or commentary. Not only was commentary necessary to illuminate the numerous obscurities in the canonical texts, but also to defend against heterodox interpretations that might arise from “naïve” explanations of the “plain meaning” of the text. But however valuable the services that commentators performed in illuminating obscurities in the canonical texts, this was not the only and perhaps not even the principal function of commentaries. Commentaries to the Analects also served a polemical purpose, to establish that the text lived up to a fairly universal set of criteria.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henderson, J. B., & Ng, O. C. (2014). The Commentarial Tradition. In Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (Vol. 4, pp. 37–53). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7113-0_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free