Modelling collective belief

234Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What is it for a group to believe something? A summative account assumes that for a group to believe that p most members of the group must believe that p. Accounts of this type are commonly proposed in interpretation of everyday ascriptions of beliefs to groups. I argue that a nonsummative account corresponds better to our unexamined understanding of such ascriptions. In particular I propose what I refer to as the 'joint acceptance' model of group belief. I argue that group beliefs according to the joint acceptance model are important phenomena whose aetiology and development require investigation. There is an analogous phenomenon of social or group preference, which social choice theory tends to ignore. © 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilbert, M. (1987). Modelling collective belief. Synthese, 73(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485446

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free