Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of mHealth apps for COVID-19 contact tracing: a systematic review of the literature

6Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Despite the enormous potential of mobile health (mHealth) apps for COVID-19 contact tracing, the adoption rate in most countries remains low. Thus, the objective of the current study is to identify facilitators and barriers of mHealth apps adoption for COVID-19 contact tracing based on existing studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of mHealth studies before December 2021 that evaluate facilitators and barriers associated with the adoption of mHealth apps for COVID-19 contact tracing. We assessed the risk of bias for all included studies using the Cochrane tool. We based our narrative synthesis on the facilitators-barriers to the adoption of mHealth framework comprising seven key factors. Results: A total of 27 articles were reviewed from 16 countries representing high income countries (France, German, Italy, United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Singapore, Belgium, Republic Ireland, Netherland, Poland, and Japan), middle-income countries (Fiji), and low-middle income countries (India). We identified the main facilitators of mHealth adoption: perceived risks to COVID-19, trust, perceived benefit, social norm, and technology readiness. The main barriers of mHealth adoption were data privacy/security concerns. Among sociodemographic factors, females, lower education, lower-income, and older individual are barriers to adoption in low-middle income countries, while most of those factors were not significantly associated with adoption in a high-income country. Conclusion: The findings imply that resolving data privacy/security issues while developing trust, perceived benefits, social norms, and technology preparedness could be effective strategies for increasing adoption intentions and app use among the general public. In low-middle-income countries, addressing digital divide is critical to the app’s adoption. Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=249500, identifier RD42021249500 (PROSPERO).

References Powered by Scopus

User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view

30705Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION

2267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions

2063Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

There’s (not) an App for that: situating smartphones, Excel and the techno-political interfaces and infrastructures of digital solutions for COVID-19

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of implementation barriers and strategic approaches for improving mHealth systems utilization in Africa: Lessons learnt from South Africa and Kenya

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adoption of contact-tracing mobile applications in Japan: the relationship with source credibility and privacy

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sujarwoto, S., & Maharani, A. (2023). Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of mHealth apps for COVID-19 contact tracing: a systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in Public Health. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1222600

Readers over time

‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

25%

Researcher 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 3

33%

Social Sciences 2

22%

Engineering 2

22%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0