A cost-utility analysis of antenatal screening to prevent congenital rubella syndrome

9Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In low vaccination coverage regions (LVR) in The Netherlands people often reject participation in the National Immunization Programme for religious reasons. During a rubella epidemic in 2004-2005, 32 pregnant women were notified with rubella, and 11 babies were born with defects related to maternal infection. This study presents a cost-utility analysis of a screening and vaccination programme for rubella focusing on three scenarios: (1) screening non-vaccinated pregnant women in LVR; (2) screening all pregnant women in LVR; (3) screening all non-vaccinated pregnant women in The Netherlands (including pregnant first-generation non-Western immigrant women). Cost-utility was estimated over a 16-year period which included two rubella outbreaks. Observed complications from the 2004-2005 epidemic were used to estimate average cost savings and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained. The programme would be cost-effective (1100/QALY gained) when assuming an acceptability of vaccination of 20% in women belonging to orthodox protestant risk groups. Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lugnér, A. K., Mollema, L., Ruijs, W. L. M., & Hahné, S. J. M. (2010). A cost-utility analysis of antenatal screening to prevent congenital rubella syndrome. Epidemiology and Infection, 138(8), 1172–1184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268809991336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free