Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses

66Citations
Citations of this article
180Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Crystalloids and different component colloids, used for volume resuscitation, are sometimes associated with various adverse effects. Clinical trial findings for such fluid types in different patients’ conditions are conflicting. Whether the mortality benefit of balanced crystalloid than saline can be inferred from sepsis to other patient group is uncertain, and adverse effect profile is not comprehensive. This study aims to compare the survival benefits and adverse effects of seven fluid types with network meta-analysis in sepsis, surgical, trauma, and traumatic brain injury patients. Methods: Searched databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and reference lists of relevant articles occurred from inception until January 2020. Studies on critically ill adults requiring fluid resuscitation were included. Intervention studies reported on balanced crystalloid, saline, iso-oncotic albumin, hyperoncotic albumin, low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (L-HES), high molecular weight HES, and gelatin. Network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects model to calculate odds ratio (OR) and mean difference. Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to assess bias. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) web application was used to rate confidence in synthetic evidence. Results: Fifty-eight trials (n = 26,351 patients) were identified. Seven fluid types were evaluated. Among patients with sepsis and surgery, balanced crystalloids and albumin achieved better survival, fewer acute kidney injury, and smaller blood transfusion volumes than saline and L-HES. In those with sepsis, balanced crystalloids significantly reduced mortality more than saline (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95) and L-HES (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.95) and reduced acute kidney injury more than L-HES (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65–0.99). However, they required the greatest resuscitation volume among all fluid types, especially in trauma patients. In patients with traumatic brain injury, saline and L-HES achieved lower mortality than albumin and balanced crystalloids; especially saline was significantly superior to iso-oncotic albumin (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35–0.87). Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis found that balanced crystalloids and albumin decreased mortality more than L-HES and saline in sepsis patients; however, saline or L-HES was better than iso-oncotic albumin or balanced crystalloids in traumatic brain injury patients. Trial registration: PROSPERO website, registration number: CRD42018115641).

References Powered by Scopus

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference

5037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: An overview and tutorial

2758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition

270Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of traumatic brain injury: a narrative review of current evidence

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tseng, C. H., Chen, T. T., Wu, M. Y., Chan, M. C., Shih, M. C., & Tu, Y. K. (2020). Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses. Critical Care, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

58%

Researcher 15

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 73

85%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

9%

Psychology 3

3%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 74

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0