Robustness of greedy type minimum evolution algorithms

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For a phylogeny reconstruction problem, Desper and Gascuel [2] proposed Greedy Minimum Evolution algorithm (in short, GME) and Balanced Minimum Evolution algorithm (in short, BME). Both of them are faster than the current major algorithm, Neighbor Joining (in short, NJ); however, less accurate when an input distance matrix has errors. In this paper, we prove that BME has the same optimal robustness to such errors as NJ but GME does not. Precisely, we prove that if the maximum distance error is less than a half of the minimum edge length of the target tree, then BME reconstruct it correctly. On the other hand, there is some distance matrix such that maximum distance error is less than 2/√n of the minimum edge length of the target tree, for which GME fails to reconstruct the target tree. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shigezumi, T. (2006). Robustness of greedy type minimum evolution algorithms. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3992 LNCS-II, pp. 815–821). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11758525_109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free