Use of biosimilar filgrastim compared with lenograstim in autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplant and in sibling allogeneic transplant

12Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Biosimilar filgrastim was compared with lenograstim for autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) in patients with haematological malignancies. Data from a separate group of sibling donors who underwent allogeneic HSCT are also reported. Methods: Patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent autologous HSCT with biosimilar filgrastim were compared with a historical control group of patients who received lenograstim. Peripheral blood (PB) cells counts were monitored after 7-8 consecutive days of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection and apheresis was performed on day 8 if PB CD34+ cell count was 10cells/Al. The target PB CD34+ cell doses were 2.0-106/kg (lymphoma), 4.0-106/kg (MM 60 years old) or 8.0-106/kg (MM <60 years old). Results: A total of 259 patients were included in the autologous HSCT comparison (biosimilar filgrastim, n=104; lenograstim, n=155). In patients with lymphoma and older MM patients (60 years old), no significant differences were observed between groups with regard to stem-cell mobilization parameters. However, in MM patients <60 years old, all parameters were significantly superior in the biosimilar filgrastim group, including the need for 1 rather than 2 apheresis procedures. No significant differences were observed between groups in median number of days to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) or platelet recovery. In the allogeneic setting, 47 sibling donors received biosimilar filgrastim. Mean CD34+ count at the first apheresis was 6.1-106/kg. A total of 13 donors needed a second apheresis and 4 required a third. Among recipients, median days to ANC recovery was 16 (10-28) and to platelet recovery was 13 (9-54). Biosimilar filgrastim is as effective as lenograstim for autologous HSCT in patients with lymphoma or MM patients 60 years old. However, mobilization with biosimilar filgrastim appeared to be superior to that with lenograstim in younger MM patients. © 2015, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Influence of the carbohydrate moiety on the stability of glycoproteins

336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peripheral blood stem cell yield in 400 normal donors mobilised with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF): Impact of age, sex, donor weight and type of G-CSF used

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical experience with Zarzio® in Europe: What have we learned?

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

G-CSF, the guardian of granulopoiesis

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current use of biosimilar G-CSF for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uddin, S., Russell, P., Farrell, M., Davy, B., Taylor, J., & Agrawal, S. G. (2015). Use of biosimilar filgrastim compared with lenograstim in autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplant and in sibling allogeneic transplant. Therapeutic Advances in Hematology, 6(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/2040620714565962

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 3

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

22%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free