Carbon Footprint of Minor Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Climate change poses a substantial threat to human health, and operating rooms (ORs) have an outsized environmental impact. The Program for Research in Sustainable Medicine (PRiSM) designed a protocol for minor foot and ankle surgery intended to reduce waste, streamline instrument trays, and minimize laundry. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the carbon footprint of procedures performed using the PRiSM protocol vs a traditional protocol. Methods: Forty adult patients undergoing foreign body removal, hammertoe correction, toe amputation, hardware removal, mass excision, or gastrocnemius recession were randomized to the PRiSM or our “Traditional” protocol. The PRiSM protocol used a smaller instrument tray, fewer drapes and towels, and minimal positioning blankets. No changes were made to surgical site preparation or operative techniques. Environmental impact was estimated using the carbon footprint, measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). Emissions associated with OR waste, instrument processing, and laundry were calculated. Results: On average, PRiSM cases had a smaller carbon footprint than Traditional cases (17.3 kg CO2e [SD = 3.2] vs 20.6 kg CO2e [SD = 2.0], P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parker, E. B., Bluman, E. M., Chiodo, C. P., Martin, E. A., & Smith, J. T. (2024). Carbon Footprint of Minor Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Foot and Ankle Orthopaedics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241238231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free