Do metacognitive beliefs predict rumination and psychological distress independently of illness representations in adults with diabetes mellitus? A prospective mediation study

5Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Adults with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) experience high levels of depression and anxiety that are not always effectively ameliorated by current therapeutic approaches. The Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) model, which underpins metacognitive therapy (MCT), posits that depression and anxiety become persistent when stored metacognitive beliefs guide an individual to respond to common thoughts and feelings in a certain way. We hypothesized that (i) metacognitive beliefs would predict depression and anxiety independently of participants' representations of their illness; and (ii) rumination would mediate independent prediction of depression and anxiety by metacognitive beliefs. Design: A prospective mediation study. Methods: Four hundred and forty-one adults with DM (Types 1 and 2) completed a two time-point survey. Metacognitive beliefs, illness representations and rumination were measured at baseline, and depression and anxiety measured at baseline and 6-months later. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling. Baseline illness representations, depression and anxiety were used as control variables. Results: A structural equation analysis showed potential mediation, by baseline rumination, of any effects of baseline metacognitive variables on 6-month distress in Type 1 and 2 diabetes samples. Significant standardized coefficients for relationships between the metacognitive latent variable and rumination were.67 (Type 1) and.75 (Type 2) and between rumination and distress of.36 and.43, respectively. These effects were independent of direct and independent effects of illness representation variables. Conclusions: Findings are consistent with metacognitive beliefs playing a key role in depression and anxiety by increasing the likelihood of rumination in adults with DM. MCT may be an effective intervention for this population, subsequent to further longitudinal testing of the S-REF model.

References Powered by Scopus

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure

31701Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7

20928Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9<sup>th</sup> edition

7126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The metacognitive-motivational links between stress and short-form video addiction

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychosocial factors associated with anxiety and depression in adolescents with epilepsy: A systematic review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applying contrastive pre-training for depression and anxiety risk prediction in type 2 diabetes patients based on heterogeneous electronic health records: A primary healthcare case study

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cherry, M. G., Brown, S. L., Purewal, R., & Fisher, P. L. (2023). Do metacognitive beliefs predict rumination and psychological distress independently of illness representations in adults with diabetes mellitus? A prospective mediation study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 28(3), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12655

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

50%

Philosophy 1

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free