User Clustering for MIMO NOMA via Classifier Chains and Gradient-Boosting Decision Trees

9Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, we propose a data-driven approach to group users in a Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) MIMO setting. Specifically, we formulate user clustering as a multi-label classification problem and solve it by coupling a Classifier Chain (CC) with a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), namely, the LightGBM algorithm. The performance of the proposed CC-LightGBM scheme is assessed via numerical simulations. For benchmarking, we consider two classical adaptation learning schemes: Multi-Label k-Nearest Neighbours (ML-KNN) and Multi-Label Twin Support Vector Machines (ML-TSVM); as well as other naive approaches. Besides, we also compare the computational complexity of the proposed scheme with those of the aforementioned benchmarks.

References Powered by Scopus

Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine

22977Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning

3340Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review on multi-label learning algorithms

2942Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Forecasting carbon price trends based on an interpretable light gradient boosting machine and Bayesian optimization

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Classifying DNS Tunneling Tools for Malicious DoH Traffic

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enhancing the performance of gradient boosting trees on regression problems

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Issaid, C. B., Anton-Haro, C., Mestre, X., & Alouini, M. S. (2020). User Clustering for MIMO NOMA via Classifier Chains and Gradient-Boosting Decision Trees. IEEE Access, 8, 211411–211421. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038490

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

56%

Engineering 2

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free