Patterns of conventional warfighting under the nuclear umbrella

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This book explores how nuclear weapons influence conventional warfighting, through three case studies of countries not party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty: Pakistan, India, and Israel. The author examines how decision makers choose a preferred pattern of war management, as well as how these choices affect conflicts, suggesting that nuclear weaponization constitutes a clear change in the relative power of countries. This distribution of power within the international system expands or reduces the selection of strategies or war management patterns available to members of the international community. However, historic traumatic events like military defeats, countries' self-images, and images of enemies form the perceptions of decision makers regarding material power and change thereof, suggesting that choices of decision makers are not affected directly by changes in relative power relations, but rather through an intermediate level of strategic culture parameter.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davidzon, I. (2020). Patterns of conventional warfighting under the nuclear umbrella. Patterns of Conventional Warfighting under the Nuclear Umbrella (pp. 1–169). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45594-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free