Incidental brain MRI findings in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

32Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The detection of incidental findings on children's brain MR imaging poses various practical issues because the lifelong implications of such findings may be profound. PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of incidental brain MR imaging findings in children. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were searched for articles published between 1985 to July 2018, with the following search terms: “incidental,” “findings,” “brain,” “MR imaging.” STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were the following: 1) patients younger than 21 years of age, 2) healthy children without any clinical condition, 3) MR images obtained with at least a 1.5T magnet, 4) original articles, and 5) a methodologic quality score of $10. DATA ANALYSIS: Two observers independently extracted data and assessed data quality and validity. The number and type of incidental findings were pooled. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic and the I2 statistic. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven studies were included, reporting 5938 children (mean age, 11.3 6 2.8 years). Incidental findings were present in 16.4% (99% CI, 9.8-26.2; Q 4 117.5, I24 94.9%) of healthy children, intracranial cysts being the most frequent (10.2%, 99% CI, 3.1-28.5; Q 4 306.4, I2 4 98.0%). Nonspecific white matter hyperintensities were reported in 1.9% (99% CI, 0.2-16.8; Q 4 73.6, I2 4 94.6%), Chiari 1 malformation was found in 0.8% (99% CI, 0.5-1.3; Q 4 7.6, I2 4 60.5%), and intracranial neoplasms were reported in 0.2% (99% CI, 0.1-0.6; Q 4 3.4, I2 4 12.3%). In total, the prevalence of incidental findings needing follow-up was 2.6% (99% CI, 0.5-11.7; Q 4 131.2, I2 4 95.4%). Incidental findings needing specific treatment were brain tumors (0.2%) and cavernomas (0.2%). LIMITATIONS: Limitations were no age stratification or ethnicity data and variation in the design of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of incidental findings is much more frequent in children than previously reported in adults, but clinically meaningfull incidental findings were present in,1 in 38 children.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dangouloff-Ros, V., Roux, C. J., Boulouis, G., Levy, R., Nicolas, N., Lozach, C., … Naggara, O. (2019). Incidental brain MRI findings in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 40(11), 1818–1823. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free