Examining the Schenck KD I Classification in Patients With Documented Tibiofemoral Knee Dislocations: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Acute tibiofemoral knee dislocations (KDs) with a single cruciate ligament remaining intact are rare and can be classified as Schenck KD I. The inclusion of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) has contributed to a recent surge in Schenck KD I prevalence and has convoluted the original definition of the classification. Purpose: To (1) report on a series of true Schenck KD I injuries with radiologically confirmed tibiofemoral dislocation and (2) introduce suffix modifications to further subclassify these injuries based on the reported cases. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified all Schenck KD I MLKIs at 2 separate institutions between January 2001 and June 2022. Single-cruciate tears were included if a concomitant complete disruption of a collateral injury was present or injuries to the posterolateral corner, posteromedial corner, or extensor mechanism. All knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging scans were retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship-trained surgeons. Only documented cases consistent with a complete tibiofemoral dislocation were included. Results: Of the 227 MLKIs, 63 (27.8%) were classified as KD I, and 12 (19.0%) of the 63 KD I injuries had a radiologically confirmed tibiofemoral dislocation. These 12 injuries were subclassified based on the following proposed suffix modifications: KD I-DA (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] only; n = 3), KD I-DAM (ACL + medial collateral ligament [MCL]; n = 3), KD I-DPM (posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] + MCL; n = 2), KD I-DAL (ACL + lateral collateral ligament [LCL]; n = 1), and KD I-DPL (PCL + LCL; n = 3). Conclusion: The Schenck classification system should only be used to describe dislocations with bicruciate injuries or with single-cruciate injuries that have clinical and/or radiological evidence of tibiofemoral dislocation. Based on the presented cases, the authors recommend the suffix modifications for subclassifying Schenck KD I injuries with the goal of improving communication, surgical management, and the design of future outcome studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Green, J. S., Yalcin, S., Moran, J., Vasavada, K., Kahan, J. B., Li, Z. I., … Medvecky, M. J. (2023). Examining the Schenck KD I Classification in Patients With Documented Tibiofemoral Knee Dislocations: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231168892

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free