Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: One decade after FDAAA

19Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA) required that information for certain clinical trials, such as details about study design features and endpoints, as well as results, be publicly reported in ClinicalTrials.gov. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of phase III trials with primary results published between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, in high-impact journals and found 74% contained at least one discrepancy between results reported in ClinicalTrials.gov and the corresponding publication. Our findings underscore the necessity for monitoring of clinical trial information and result reporting between sources; a checklist may provide a systemized procedure for investigators and editors to monitor accurate reporting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Talebi, R., Redberg, R. F., & Ross, J. S. (2020). Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: One decade after FDAAA. Trials, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04603-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free