Close contact casting vs surgery for initial treatment of unstable ankle fractures in older adults a randomized clinical trial

92Citations
Citations of this article
306Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Ankle fractures cause substantial morbidity in older persons. Surgical fixation is the contemporary intervention but is associated with infection and other healing complications. OBJECTIVE To determine whether initial fracture treatment with close contact casting, a molded below-knee cast with minimal padding, offers outcome equivalent to that with immediate surgery, with fewer complications and less health resource use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Thiswas a pragmatic, equivalence, randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessors. A pilot study commenced in May 2004, followed by multicenter recruitment from July 2010 to November 2013; follow-up was completed May 2014. Recruitment was from 24 UK major trauma centers and general hospitals. Participants were 620 adults older than 60 years with acute, overtly unstable ankle fracture. Exclusions were serious limb or concomitant disease or substantial cognitive impairment. INTERVENTIONS Participantswere randomly assigned to surgery (n = 309) or casting (n = 311). Castswere applied in the operating room under general or spinal anesthesia by a trained surgeon. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary 6-month, per-protocol outcomewas the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 6 months (OMAS; range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes and fewer symptoms), equivalence prespecified as ±6 points. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, pain, ankle motion, mobility, complications, health resource use, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Among 620 adults (mean age, 71 years; 460 [74%]women) whowere randomized, 593 (96%) completed the study. Nearly all participants (579/620; 93%) received allocated treatment; 52 of 275 (19%) who initially received casting later converted to surgery, whichwas allowable in the casting treatment pathway to manage early loss of fracture reduction. At 6 months, casting resulted in ankle function equivalent to that with surgery (OMAS score, 66.0 [95%CI, 63.6-68.5] for surgery vs 64.5 [95%CI, 61.8-67.2] for casting; mean difference,-0.6 [95%CI,-3.9 to 2.6]; P for equivalence = .001). Infection andwound breakdownwere more common with surgery (29/298 [10%] vs 4/275 [1%]; odds ratio [OR], 7.3 [95%CI, 2.6-20.2]), aswere additional operating room procedures (18/298 [6%] for surgery and 3/275 [1%] for casting; OR, 5.8 [95%CI, 1.8-18.7]). Radiologic malunionwas more common in the casting group (38/249 [15%] vs 8/274 [3%] for surgery; OR, 6.0 [95%CI, 2.8-12.9]). Casting required less operating room time compared with surgery (mean difference [minutes/participant],-54 [95%CI,-58 to-50]). Therewere no significant differences in other secondary outcomes: quality of life, pain, ankle motion, mobility, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among older adults with unstable ankle fracture, the use of close contact casting compared with surgery resulted in similar functional outcomes at 6 months. Close contact castingmay be an appropriate treatment for such patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Willett, K., Keene, D. J., Mistry, D., Nam, J., Tutton, E., Handley, R., … Lamb, S. E. (2016). Close contact casting vs surgery for initial treatment of unstable ankle fractures in older adults a randomized clinical trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 316(14), 1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.14719

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free