A Surrealistic Mega-Analysis of Redisorganization Theories

  • Oxman A
  • Sackett D
  • Chalmers I
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND We are sick and tired of being redisorganized. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the empirical evidence for organizational theories and repeated reorganizations. METHODS We did not find anything worth reading, other than Dilbert, so we fantasized. Unfortunately, our fantasies may well resemble many people's realities. We are sorry about this, but it is not our fault. RESULTS We discovered many reasons for repeated reorganizations, the most common being 'no good reason'. We estimated that trillions of dollars are being spent on strategic and organizational planning activities each year, thus providing lots of good reasons for hundreds of thousands of people, including us, to get into the business. New leaders who are intoxicated with the prospect of change further fuel perpetual cycles of redisorganization. We identified eight indicators of successful redisorganizations, including large consultancy fees paid to friends and relatives. CONCLUSIONS We propose the establishment of ethics committees to review all future redisorganization proposals in order to put a stop to uncontrolled, unplanned experimentation inflicted providers and users of the health services.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oxman, A., Sackett, D., Chalmers, I., & Prescott, T. (2006). A Surrealistic Mega-Analysis of Redisorganization Theories. Healthcare Quarterly, 9(3), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq..18228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free