Mathematical Aesthetic Judgements

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapters discusses how the aesthetic as process theory accounts for mathematical aesthetic judgements and also presents a review of the most relevant insights afforded by the aesthetic-as-process theory. The question ‘what do mathematicians mean when they talk about beauty?’ is answered in a simple way: mathematicians employ aesthetic terms in a literal sense, but their use is closer to the way aesthetic terms are used by specialists, critics or artists, rather than by an average person. Appreciation depends profoundly on a great deal of background mathematical knowledge. Our goal of literally interpreting aesthetic judgements in mathematics is achieved with the following interpretation: mathematical aesthetic judgements are articulated expressions of subjective states which result from an affective engagement of our attention to a mathematical item. The affective reaction reflects our preferences and values, which in turn are modulated by our natural tendencies and cultural influences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montano, U. (2014). Mathematical Aesthetic Judgements. In Synthese Library (Vol. 370, pp. 161–163). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03452-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free