First-generation vs second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Which is best at diagnosis of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia?

18Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 2020, for the great majority of patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), life expectancy is unaffected by a diagnosis of CML because of the unparalleled efficacy of ABL-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in halting disease progression. A wealth of choices exist for first-line treatment selection, including the first-generation TKI imatinib and the second-generation TKIs bosutinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. How I select first-line therapy between first-generation and second-generation TKIs is discussed in the context of patient-specific CML disease risk, therapy-related risks, and treatment goals. Although rare, identifying patients with CML at higher risk for disease progression or resistance is important and influences first-line TKI selection. I review the impact of first-generation vs second-generation TKI selection on treatment response and outcomes; the ability to achieve, as well as the timing of, treatment-free remission; and the impact of specific TKIs on longer-term health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oehler, V. G. (2020). First-generation vs second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Which is best at diagnosis of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia? Hematology (United States), 20(1), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1182/HEMATOLOGY.2020000108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free