This publication represents a proposed approach to quality standards and guidelines for canine clinical genetic testing laboratories. Currently, there are no guidelines for laboratories performing clinical testing on dogs. Thus, there is no consensus set of protocols that set the minimal standards of quality among these laboratories, potentially causing variable results between laboratories, inconsistencies in reporting, and the inability to share information that could impact testing among organizations. A minimal standard for quality in testing is needed as breeders use the information from genetic testing to make breeding choices and irreversible decisions regarding spay, neuter or euthanasia. Incorrect results can have significant impact on the health of the dogs being tested and on their subsequent progeny. Because of the potentially serious consequences of an incorrect result or incorrect interpretation, results should be reviewed by and reported by individuals who meet a minimum standard of qualifications. Quality guidelines for canine genetic testing laboratories should include not only the analytical phase, but also the preanalytical and postanalytical phases, as this document attempts to address.
CITATION STYLE
Shaffer, L. G., Sundin, K., Geretschlaeger, A., Segert, J., Swinburne, J. E., Royal, R., … Ballif, B. C. (2019). Standards and guidelines for canine clinical genetic testing laboratories. Human Genetics, 138(5), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-018-1954-4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.