Preferring the Most Specific Argument

  • Prakken H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter I start the investigation of a second way of modelling reasoning with defeasible rules; this is the method of allowing for incompatible solutions to a problem and choosing the exceptional one if it exists. In this method exceptions can be left implicit: no use has to be made of exception or applicability clauses, since exceptions are identified as a result of the choice. As already mentioned in Chapter 3, when applied to legislation this method corresponds to application of the legal collision rule Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prakken, H. (1997). Preferring the Most Specific Argument (pp. 141–178). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8975-8_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free