Can central venous access device care bundles and regular feedback reduce central line-associated complications in pediatric patients?

14Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The use of indwelling central venous access devices (CVADs) in children can result in complications such as infection, occlusion, and dislodgement. Purpose: To evaluate whether reinforcing CVAD care bundles by using a regular direct feedback system could reduce such complications in children. Methods: The intervention in this retrospective interrupted time-series study was initiated in January 2019. The study was divided into the preintervention (October–December 2018), 3-month postintervention (January–March 2019), and 6-month postintervention (April–June 2019) phases. Risk difference and Poisson regression analyses were used to illustrate the effectiveness of the intervention. Results: The hospital-wide central line-related bloodstream infection rate decreased from 10.0/1,000 catheter-days to 4.5/ 1,000 catheter-days at 3-month postintervention (P=0.39) and to 1.4/1,000 catheter-days at 6-month postintervention (P= 0.047). The central line occlusion rate significantly decreased from 30% to 12.8% (P=0.04) and 8.3% (P=0.002) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Approximately 7% of CVADs became dislodged during the preintervention phase versus 8.5% (P= 0.364) and 3.3% (P=0.378) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Conclusion: Reinforcing CVAD care bundles with direct feedback could significantly decrease CVAD-associated complications in terms of infection at 6-month postintervention, and occlusion at 3-and 6-month postintervention. Thus, reinforce-ment and regular direct feedback might improve care quality in children with CVADs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaiyakulsil, C., & Pharadornuwat, O. (2021). Can central venous access device care bundles and regular feedback reduce central line-associated complications in pediatric patients? Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics, 64(3), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2020.00143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free