Kalman filter and analog schemes to postprocess numerical weather predictions

200Citations
Citations of this article
129Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two new postprocessing methods are proposed to reduce numerical weather prediction's systematic and random errors. The first method consists of running a postprocessing algorithm inspired by the Kalman filter (KF) through an ordered set of analog forecasts rather than a sequence of forecasts in time (ANKF). The analog of a forecast for a given location and time is defined as a past prediction that matches selected features of the current forecast. The second method is the weighted average of the observations that verified when the 10 best analogs were valid (AN).ANKFandANare tested for 10-m wind speed predictions from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, with observations from 400 surface stations over the western United States for a 6-month period. Both AN and ANKF predict drastic changes in forecast error (e.g., associated with rapid weather regime changes), a feature lacking in KF and a 7-day running-mean correction (7-Day). TheANalmost eliminates the bias of the raw prediction (Raw), whileANKFdrastically reduces it with values slightly worse than KF. Both analog-based methods are also able to reduce random errors, therefore improving the predictive skill of Raw. TheANis consistently the best, with average improvements of 10%, 20%, 25%, and 35% with respect to ANKF, KF, 7-Day, and Raw, as measured by centered root-mean-square error, and of 5%, 20%, 25%, and 40%, as measured by rank correlation. Moreover, being a prediction based solely on observations, AN results in an efficient downscaling procedure that eliminates representativeness discrepancies between observations and predictions. © 2011 American Meteorological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Monache, L. D., Nipen, T., Liu, Y., Roux, G., & Stull, R. (2011). Kalman filter and analog schemes to postprocess numerical weather predictions. Monthly Weather Review, 139(11), 3554–3570. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011MWR3653.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free