Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring in pregnant patients with palpitations

10Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To assess the frequency of rhythm disturbances (RDs) obtained following placement of a Holter monitor or an event loop recorder (ERT) in patients referred to cardiologists. Study Design Ninety-six gravidas were referred to the cardiology clinic for palpitations, syncope, or dizziness and had Holter monitoring or ERT after a baseline electroencephalogram. Arrhythmias were classified by severity. Results Gestational age at referral was 22.6 weeks ± 8.3 days. Sixty-five patients had ERTs performed, and 19 had Holter monitors. Seventy-six percent had benign arrhythmias. In our ERT cohort, history of arrhythmias showed a fourfold increase in serious RD during gestation (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 20.3, p = 0.01); obesity (body mass index >30) had a fourfold increased risk (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 1, p = 0.03). Serious RD did not result in greater chance of cesarean delivery or induction of labor, or a newborn with arrhythmias. Conclusion Most pregnant women with palpitations have benign arrhythmias. ERT appears to be a better method of diagnosis in pregnant women. Copyright © 2013 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cruz, M. O., Hibbard, J. U., Alexander, T., & Briller, J. (2013). Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring in pregnant patients with palpitations. American Journal of Perinatology, 30(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1321500

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free