Estudio DISEHTAC II: Diagnóstico y seguimiento de la hipertensión arterial en Cataluña. Comparación con los datos de 1996

21Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the changes in the diagnosis and follow-up of hypertension, and in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk, in a population served by primary care centers in Catalonia (northeastern Spain). Management was evaluated with indicators published in the Guidelines for Hypertension for Primary Care (Guia de Hipertensión Arterial para la Atención Primaria). Design. Multicenter, observational, before-after design (1996-2001). Setting. Primary care. Participants. Twelve primary care centers chosen from among the 31 centers that took part in the DISEHTAC I study (1996), with a total of 990 patient records. Main measures. We analyzed age, sex, date of diagnosis of hypertension, number of blood pressure measurements needed for diagnosis, use of the mean value of duplicate blood pressure determinations, values for all blood pressure measurements in 2001, blood pressure determinations during the preceding 6 months, screening for and diagnosis of diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity, and left ventricular hypertrophy. Results. Of the 171 new cases of hypertension, 16.7% were diagnosed from at least 3 duplicate blood pressure measurements or as a result of acute episodes of hypertension. About one third (32.4%) of the patients with hypertension had blood pressure values below 140 and 90 mm Hg (25.7% in 1996), and the difference between the 2 sets of survey results was statistically significant. In three fourths (75.4%) of the patients, blood pressure had been measured during the preceding 6 months; this percentage was not significantly different in comparison to the figure found in 1996. Screening to detect cardiovascular risk factors was done in 50.4% of the patients (63.1% in 1996). Conclusions. Follow-up for hypertension in Catalonia has improved notably since 1996, but there was no improvement in the diagnosis of risk factors or in the integral evaluation of cardiovascular risk.

References Powered by Scopus

The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: The JNC 7 report

17356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus

7721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure

6541Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in an adult type 2 diabetes Spanish population between 2003 and 2009

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationship among the degree of control of arterial hypertension, comorbidity and costs in individuals over age 30 during 2006

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Compliance with hypertension therapy in spain, according to the views of family doctors. Cumplex project

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benítez Camps, M., Pérez Zamora, S., Dalfó Baqué, A., Piqueras Garre, M. M., Losada Doval, G., & Vila Coll, M. A. (2005). Estudio DISEHTAC II: Diagnóstico y seguimiento de la hipertensión arterial en Cataluña. Comparación con los datos de 1996. Atencion Primaria, 35(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1157/13071038

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free