Evaluating the Y chromosomal STR dating in deep-rooting pedigrees

10Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Y chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) has been used in time estimations for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) lineages or eminent persons. But to choose which mutation rate and estimation method in the Y chromosome dating is controversial, since different rates and methods can result in several-fold deviation. Findings: We used two deep-rooting pedigrees with full records and reliable dates to directly evaluate the Y chromosomal STR mutation rates and dating methods. We found that the Y chromosomal genealogical mutation rates (OMRB and lmMR) in BATWING method can give the best-fit estimation for historical lineage dating. Conclusions: This study validated a very efficient and reliable way for genealogy and historical anthropology researches.

Figures

  • Table 1 Time estimation in two deep-rooting pedigrees using both

References Powered by Scopus

A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y-Chromosomal binary haplogroups

721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New binary polymorphisms reshape and increase resolution of the human Y chromosomal haplogroup tree

704Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The genetic legacy of the Mongols

398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Toward a consensus on SNP and STR mutation rates on the human Y-chromosome

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determining Y-STR mutation rates in deep-routing genealogies: Identification of haplogroup differences

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dispersals of the Siberian Y-chromosome haplogroup Q in Eurasia

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, C. C., & Li, H. (2015). Evaluating the Y chromosomal STR dating in deep-rooting pedigrees. Investigative Genetics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13323-015-0025-z

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Researcher 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 15

63%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

29%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Physics and Astronomy 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0