Evaluation of Four Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 Detection: Characteristics and Prospects

  • Chen Y
  • Ma Y
  • Han Y
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the study, we reported an evaluation of 4 detection strategies implemented in different scenarios for SARS-CoV-2 detection: single sampling tests, 20-in-1 pooling tests, nucleic acid point-of-care tests, and rapid antigen tests. 3 SARS-CoV-2-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and 5 recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteins were used for evaluation. In this analysis, we found that for the WT, Delta, and Omicron supernatants, the lowest concentrations to achieve 100% detection rates of single sampling tests ranged between 1.28 × 10 2 to 1.02 × 10 3 , 1.28 × 10 2 to 4.10 × 10 3 , and 1.28 × 10 2 to 2.05 × 10 3 copies/mL. The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has posed an enormous burden on the global public health system and has had disastrous socioeconomic consequences. Currently, single sampling tests, 20-in-1 pooling tests, nucleic acid point-of-care tests (POCTs), and rapid antigen tests are implemented in different scenarios to detect SARS-CoV-2, but a comprehensive evaluation of them is scarce and remains to be explored. In this study, 3 SARS-CoV-2 inactivated cell culture supernatants were used to evaluate the analytical performance of these strategies. Additionally, 5 recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) proteins were also used for rapid antigen tests. For the wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron strains, the lowest inactivated virus concentrations to achieve 100% detection rates of single sampling tests ranged between 1.28 × 10 2 to 1.02 × 10 3 , 1.28 × 10 2 to 4.10 × 10 3 , and 1.28 × 10 2 to 2.05 × 10 3 copies/mL. The 20-in-1 pooling tests ranged between 1.30 × 10 2 to 1.04 × 10 3 , 5.19 × 10 2 to 2.07 × 10 3 , and 2.59 × 10 2 to 1.04 × 10 3 copies/mL. The nucleic acid POCTs were all 1.42 × 103 copies/mL. The rapid antigen tests ranged between 2.84 × 10 5 to 7.14 × 10 6 , 8.68 × 10 4 to 7.14 × 10 6 , and 1.12 × 10 5 to 3.57 × 10 6 copies/mL. For the WT, Delta AY.2, Delta AY.1/AY.3, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.2 recombinant N proteins, the lowest concentrations to achieve 100% detection rates of rapid antigen tests ranged between 3.47 to 142.86, 1.74 to 142.86, 3.47 to 142.86, 3.47 to 142.86, and 5.68-142.86 ng/mL, respectively. This study provided helpful insights into the scientific deployment of tests and recommended the full-scale consideration of the testing purpose, resource availability, cost performance, result rapidity, and accuracy to facilitate a profound pathway toward the long-term surveillance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). IMPORTANCE In the study, we reported an evaluation of 4 detection strategies implemented in different scenarios for SARS-CoV-2 detection: single sampling tests, 20-in-1 pooling tests, nucleic acid point-of-care tests, and rapid antigen tests. 3 SARS-CoV-2-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and 5 recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteins were used for evaluation. In this analysis, we found that for the WT, Delta, and Omicron supernatants, the lowest concentrations to achieve 100% detection rates of single sampling tests ranged between 1.28 × 10 2 to 1.02 × 10 3 , 1.28 × 10 2 to 4.10 × 10 3 , and 1.28 × 10 2 to 2.05 × 10 3 copies/mL. The 20-in-1 pooling tests ranged between 1.30 × 10 2 to 1.04 × 10 3 , 5.19 × 10 2 to 2.07 × 10 3 , and 2.59 × 10 2 to 1.04 × 10 3 copies/mL. The nucleic acid POCTs were all 1.42 × 10 3 copies/mL. The rapid antigen tests ranged between 2.84 × 10 5 to 7.14 × 10 6 , 8.68 × 10 4 to 7.14 × 10 6 , and 1.12 × 10 5 to 3.57 × 10 6 copies/mL. For the WT, Delta AY.2, Delta AY.1/AY.3, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.2 recombinant N proteins, the lowest concentrations to achieve 100% detection rates of rapid antigen tests ranged between 3.47 to 142.86, 1.74 to 142.86, 3.47 to 142.86, 3.47 to 142.86, and 5.68 to 142.86 ng/mL, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Y., Ma, Y., Han, Y., Diao, Z., Chang, L., Li, J., & Zhang, R. (2022). Evaluation of Four Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 Detection: Characteristics and Prospects. Microbiology Spectrum, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02143-22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free