Effects of phase morphology on mechanical properties: Oriented/unoriented PP crystal combination with spherical/microfibrillar PET phase

23Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In situ microfibrillation and multiflow vibrate injection molding (MFVIM) technologies were combined to control the phase morphology of blended polypropylene (PP) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), wherein PP is the majority phase. Four kinds of phase structures were formed using different processing methods. As the PET content changes, the best choice of phase structure also changes. When the PP matrix is unoriented, oriented microfibrillar PET can increase the mechanical properties at an appropriate PET content. However, if the PP matrix is an oriented structure (shish-kebab), only the use of unoriented spherical PET can significantly improve the impact strength. Besides this, the compatibilizer polyolefin grafted maleic anhydride (POE-g-MA) can cover the PET in either spherical or microfibrillar shape to form a core-shell structure, which tends to improve both the yield and impact strength. We focused on the influence of all composing aspects-fibrillation of the dispersed PET, PP matrix crystalline morphology, and compatibilized interface-on the mechanical properties of PP/PET blends as well as potential synergies between these components. Overall, we provided a theoretical basis for the mechanical recycling of immiscible blends.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mi, D., Wang, Y., Kuzmanovic, M., Delva, L., Jiang, Y., Cardon, L., … Ragaert, K. (2019). Effects of phase morphology on mechanical properties: Oriented/unoriented PP crystal combination with spherical/microfibrillar PET phase. Polymers, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020248

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free