Problem Structuring Process by Qualitative Meta-synthesis Technologies

  • Tang X
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we first review some typical frameworks proposed for the so-called unstructured or wicked problem solving and the relevant computerized support development. Those include two decision-making models for decision support systems development (Simon's 3-phase model and Courtney's framework) and two problem structuring approaches in strategic decision-making (strategic assumption surfacing and testing -- SAST by US scholars and Wisdom process proposed by UK researchers). Such an analysis aims to explain the working philosophy of meta-synthesis system approach, especially toward problem structuring where supporting technologies are needed to help distill visions from those original or first-hand on-site community opinions. Finally two technologies, CorMap and iView for qualitative meta-synthesis applied to idea or assumptions generation for further verification and validation, are briefly addressed, together with their practical applications on group discussion, social psychology mining and expert knowledge mining, etc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, X. (2016). Problem Structuring Process by Qualitative Meta-synthesis Technologies (pp. 79–105). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55218-5_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free