Computer Methods, Imaging and Visualization in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II

  • Bäumler K
  • Zimmermann J
  • Ennis D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Based on the patient-specific model of a Type B aortic dissection we created a second model with reduced entry and exit tear size. Two sets of simulations were performed for each model: (i) fluid struc- ture interaction (FSI) and (ii) rigid wall simulations. In both simulation modalities we found that alterations in tear size had substantial impact on true to false lumen flow ratios, true and false lumen pressure dif- ferences, and loss of systolic pressure along the dissection. Compared to rigid wall simulations, FSI simulations yielded decreased true lumen flow ratios, increased dampening of flow waveforms along the aorta, smaller negative pressure differences in the distal dissection, and smaller sys- tolic pressure drops across entry and exit tears. These results underline the sensitivity of simulation-based quantitative hemodynamics in aortic dissections to tear size and tissue stiffness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bäumler, K., Zimmermann, J., Ennis, D. B., Marsden, A. L., & Fleischmann, D. (2023). Computer Methods, Imaging and Visualization in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II. (J. M. R. S. Tavares, C. Bourauel, L. Geris, & J. Vander Slote, Eds.), Computer Methods, Imaging and Visualization in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering II (Vol. 38, pp. 143–152). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10015-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free