Justice and moderation in the state: Aristotle and beyond

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter I aim to analyze Aristotle is account of political justice (to politikon dikaion) in both the Nicomachean Ethics and the Politics, 1 since it is these accounts that are most relevant to his advocacy of moderation and mixed constitution, and I aim to show how justice (dikaiosun.) and equality (isotes) are crucial for the promotion of the common interest (to koin. symferon) of the state (polis). In addition, I explore the connection made between justice (dikaiosune; aplos or politikon dikaion), equality (isotes), democracy (demokratia), liberty (eleutheria), and friendship (philia), and attempt to further excavate Aristotletfs conception of political justice (to politikon dikaion) and moderation in the polis. We will see how this bears on questions in contemporary political philosophy concerning the role of justice as the most fundamental virtue for society, and as an institution that serves to fix the limits of human conduct and to lay down the principles specifying the just distribution of benefits and burdens in a democratic society of equals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leontsini, E. (2015). Justice and moderation in the state: Aristotle and beyond. In Philosophy of Justice (pp. 27–42). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9175-5_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free